Last week, I was having a discussion with someone who mentioned that a mutual acquaintance is an INTJ. I think she knew that I was familiar with Myers-Briggs, but regardless, it was one of the most helpful remarks she could have made. I’ve been interested in Myers-Briggs for quite some time. I find it to be a very helpful, descriptive (as opposed to predictive) tool for understanding how different people perceive the world.

Myers-Briggs divides personalities along four axes: Introvert-Extrovert (I/E), Sensing-Intuition (S/N), Thinking-Feeling (T/F) and Judging-Perceiving (J/P). The I/E axis is probably the one that most closely reflects the standard definitions. S/N refers to how much one relies on facts and data-points (sensing) versus intuitive work. T/F is pretty close to standard definitions. J/P is the most confusing. Judging in this case is really “decisiveness,” while Perceiving refers to adaptability, spontaneity, etc.

What I’ve found is that the Myers-Briggs personality types are fairly good at describing a person. Not perfect, obviously, for example, there isn’t an honesty/dishonesty axis. But overall, a pretty good descriptor. For example, I’m an INTP (one of the more rare types, but well represented in IT) and one of the best descriptions of me was from someone who never met me – it was a generic INTP profile off of the INTP website (yes, we really all are nerds).

What’s interesting, and harder to get a handle on, are the differences and the relationships between the different types. One of the things that I find interesting are the four types that are adjacent to mine (ENTPs, ISTPs, INFPs and INTJs). Each of them is like looking in a fun-house mirror. Their personalities are similar to, but not quite the same as mine. They reflect different aspects of my own personality.

ENTPs are, not surprisingly, outgoing and dynamic. They are smart and articulate. In a project, I love teaming up with an ENTP. They’re much better with working people and explaining the project to them.

I don’t know many ISTPs (at least to my knowledge). Some of the Myers-Briggs sites suggest that we arrive at similar results, but with different approaches.

INFPs seem very similar, but their intuition and perceiving manifest themselves in ways that often feel dreamy and silly. I was looking in on an INTP website one time and, apparently, every time an INFP would show up, it would wind up in (electronic) tears. We think in similar ways, but about completely different things. An unfair generalization is that INTPs think about computers, photography, philosophy, etc.; while INFPs think about ponies and unicorns. Hey, I admitted that it was unfair.

INTJs scare me.  INTPs tend to study or get involved with a broad number of topics.  If you ask an INTP if s/he knows something about a topic, they might say, “some.”  When you talk to them, you find out that they know quite a bit; they just don’t realize what they know and they are often uncertain – we’re seldom willing to claim that we are absolutely right about anything.  INTJs on the other hand know exactly what it is that they know and they know they are right.  There’s little doubt in their minds.  If an INTJ says s/he knows something, they do.  If they don’t know it, they know they don’t.  There’s no uncertainty and they are quite likely to think they are right.

Don’t get me wrong, I admire the INTJs – they make much better IT leaders than INTPs; but their definitiveness scares me.  When they’re wrong (and they occasionally are) it’s hard to argue with them and hard to convince them otherwise.

Anyway, there wasn’t much of a point to this, just musing – as we INTPs are wont to do 🙂

Find out how scoring works in your league. Typically fantasy baseball work on a 4×4 or 5×5 scoring system based on either 4 or 5 offensive and 4 or 5 pitching statistics. The stats for a 4×4 system are usually team batting average, home runs, RBI and stolen bases for offense and wins, saves, ERA and WHIP for pitching. For 5×5 leagues, runs and strikeouts are often added. Some leagues go to a 6×6 system or more, adding in other statistics like OPS and holds.Although billiards has been played in this country in one form or another for over a century, never has it enjoyed more mainstream popularity than it has over the past fifteen years. I’m sure that half a century ago no pool player could have imagined regularly televised events, sanctioned tournaments with $50,000 prize pools, and Oscar winning movies with pool at the heart of Fake Oakley Frogskins the story line.Cincinnati won the last meeting between these clubs, 31 13, at Paul Brown Stadium in 2012. The Giants are 3 0 all time at home against the Bengals, with each win coming by seven or fewer points. Green caught nine passes for 121 yards in Week 8, recording his fourth 100+ yard receiving game of the season, and the 28th of his NFL career. Green needs 104 yards receiving Monday night to become the second player in NFL history to record six straight cheap jordan seasons to begin his career with 1000+ yards (Randy Replica Football Jerseys Moss).David Phyall, a 50 year old British man, really really didn’t want to leave his apartment block, which was set to be demolished. Alternative accommodations were offered to him 11 times, but David just wasn’t taking. One by one, replica oakleys all his neighbors moved out, leaving him the sole holdout rattling around in a condemned apartment building all on his own.That means you’re trading sugar for artificial sweeteners, and experts say that’s a bad idea from multiple angles. Those sweeteners have some possible long term side effects and might even trick your body into slowing down its metabolism, causing you to actually gain more weight than if you were on the regular stuff. But maybe your particular brand uses stevia, the trendy natural sugar substitute. Well, you should know it might even be more controversial than artificial sweeteners and has been banned in the EU.Of the several loline alkaloids produced by Neotyphodium strains, N formylloline is typically found in the highest concentrations (Justus et al., 1997). In some cases, total concentration of lolines can exceed 2 of the dry weight of the grass (Blankenship et al., 2001; De wen et al., 2006).Because lolines can be produced in such large amounts in infected grasses, we reasoned that they might constitute a major carbon source available to bacteria in the phyllosphere of infected grasses and hence select for a distinctive microflora.

2 Responses to “Myers-Briggs”

  1. Will Says:

    Do you think INTPs–I’m one too–are particuraly drawn to Myers-Briggs? I serves that need to have things explained in a logical way.


  2. cec Says:

    Absolutely – Myers-Briggs is a model for describing the world and that’s what we INTPs do best 🙂