Work blogging

Last week at work was pretty interesting. On Tuesday, L and I flew up to Dayton for the day to meet with our sponsors. That meant a 6am flight out and originally a 11pm return flight. Fortunately, we wrapped it up a bit early and landed home back around 8:30pm. The meeting went well. We were presenting some ideas that I had to the sponsors and they seemed to like them. Strangely enough, in talking to L, he said that he hadn’t really understood what I was proposing until the meeting. Not bad for a guy who wrote a short paper for the sponsors that described what he didn’t understand! But then, I guess that’s why L’s a full professor 🙂

Wednesday was largely recovery. Thursday, I met with the other modeling guy on the team who was in from New York. We discussed what I wanted to do and he seemed to have a good handle on it which was good because later in the afternoon L came in and wanted to discuss it in more detail. He had been stuck in an airport and had time to think through some things. The bad news is that he didn’t think my proposed modeling would work. The good news is that he thought he had a fix.

Turned out that I had forgotten that the underlying model we are using is a Markov model. The basic requirement of the model is that the software agent can only be in one state at a time. I was essentially proposing that the agent could be in multiple states simultaneously. As we talked more, I realized that L’s proposal was to generalize what I was getting at. Essentially, I described the special case of m=1. Before my proposal, we had been working with m=n. L’s proposal was to let m vary between 1 and n. This bugged me at first since I thought m>1 wasn’t necessary. I was also concerned since L and the other modeler, N, had theoretical objections to m=1. I pointed out that really for any m<n, their theoretical objections held true, so nothing was really more wrong with m=1. Everyone agreed with that and we further agreed that a varying m would still have some theoretical problems, but would be more effective, more realistic and more tractable than m=n or m=1.

Wrapping that up, I received a short email from L on Friday thanking me for the work, saying that was a good white board session and that he could see how my thinking was influencing his for the better. That was nice 🙂

p.s. if y’all are really nice, I promise not to write a blog post on Markov decision processes

“Kathryn Smith has done an outstanding job in the seven years that she has worked with our staff,” said Bills Head Coach Rex Ryan. “She certainly deserves this promotion based on her knowledge and strong commitment, just to name a couple of her outstanding qualities, and I just know she’s going to do a great job serving in the role of Quality Control Special Teams.”So called memory champions have been doing it forever. They call it creating a memory palace.Here’s how it works: You pick Cheap Jerseys a familiar place that you know well and can imagine without much problem the inside of your house, the layout of your neighborhood, whatever. You then imagine yourself walking along a specific route in that place and associate an item on your list fake oakleys with each location.”Shit, that reminds me, I’m out of chloroform.”So let’s say you’re trying to remember a long grocery list, and you choose to use your neighborhood to mentally visualize it. Born in Queens, Trump himself has long been a fixture of New York City. For decades, Trump’s playboy lifestyle and multiple weddings and divorces were favorite features in the city’s tabloids. Trump flirted in the past with running for New York City mayor. Along the Hudson River and parallel to the West Side Highway sit a row of buildings that make up Trump Place luxury condominiums that stretch from 59th Street to 72nd Street. http://www.nfljerseysshow.com The Trump name is featured on numerous other buildings across the city, including Trump Parc, Trump Soho New York and Trump World Tower.1920s Hollywood was a lot looser on both safety standards and record keeping, http://www.cheapjerseysupplyforyou.com but it’s generally agreed that there was one fatality when a chariot wheel broke and the driver was thrown into a pile of lumber. The story of some poor stuntman’s death persisted right up until the 1959 version swept into theaters and won almost every Oscar they had a category for. cheap nfl jerseys shop So naturally, that became the movie everyone pictured whenever they heard “Ben Hur.””There’s 40,000 West Point graduates behind you,” read one. Another is from overseas: “Go after the NFL dream and ignore anybody who says that deploying is the only way to serve. I’m in Afghanistan right now, and I’ll happily tell anyone who disagrees with your choice that the world has enough NFL Jerseys Cheap 2LT’s [second lieutenants] to let a guy with the potential for a pro career to give that dream a shot. If you represent us well as a player and a public figure, it’s more than enough for me.”If you have been reading the news the past week, you know that Activision’s Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 has launched to great fan fare selling $550 million worth of product in its first five days setting the record for biggest entertainment launch in history. But did you know that Infinity Ward, the key developer team of the Call of Duty franchise, started out making Medal of Honor games for EA? During that time John Riccitiello was a important managerial executive when the key members of the developer team left and joined up with Activision. This was a head scratcher to many people in the games industry. Most of acquisitions to this point have been the low tens of million dollar range from Irrational Games to Bungie which was bought by Microsoft. The only other mega cheap football jerseys china acquisition was Microsoft’s $375 million cash buy out of Rare, which by this point everyone knew was complete disaster.

2 Responses to “Work blogging”

  1. etselec Says:

    Ok, in order to translate all that in my head, I had to do the following:

    m=1 translated to ‘red’
    m=n translated to ‘blue’
    1<m<n translated to ‘purple’

    Then I could see what the arguments were. Am I a weirdo?

    Must be the right-brainedness and visual orientation.

  2. cec Says:

    Makes sense to me – at least in as so far as red and blue are both specific instances of purple. 🙂